Can You Beat the Florida Foreclosure Clock?

July 29, 2015

Is there a statute of limitations on foreclosure filings in Florida?

This has been a very hot topic for the last few years in our courts.

As thousands of foreclosure cases flood our Florida court system, a common theme has been risen especially on the older foreclosure filings.  Whereas many cases have a set maximum period of time in which legal proceedings may be initiated, this has not held true with mortgage foreclosures.  One of the precedent cases used by the banks is Singleton v. Greymar[1] which allows banks to re-file a foreclosure case over and over, despite a previous dismissal.  Banks are able to re-file just by using a different default date in the new filing.  This rule seems heavily weighted towards the bank who may or may not have protected their legal interests in an appropriate amount of time.

There is a case scheduled to be heard at the Florida Supreme Court which hopefully will even up the playing field a little between banks and homeowners.  In November, Bartram v. US Bank will directly challenge this statute of limitations.  In Bartram, the borrower insists that the court has grossly misinterpreted the Singleton decision to allow the statute of limitations to restart with every deficient payment.  Bartram continues to argue the statute of limitations begins from the date the mortgage was accelerated.

The outcome of this case has the potential of changing the foreclosure atmosphere in Florida for years to come.  It will be interesting to see which way the court decides.

[1] Singleton v. Greymar Assocs., 882 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 2004)

The Law Office of Robert Eckard & Associates (LORE) has not been retained for this or any other matter by you until such time as a duly executed retainer is signed by you and an authorized agent of LORE and any retainer deposit paid and returned to us.  Nothing contained herein is intended to create an attorney client relationship or be considered legal advice, as such, no conflict of interest shall be presumed in the event LORE is later retained by an adverse party.  See Rule 4-1.18 et. al., 2006 Florida Supreme Court.

Our Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Thank you for your help with this matter. Because of your relationships and wisdom, I have been given another chance to practice medicine again and learn from my mistakes. This has been a life changing experience leading to soul searching as to who I really am and what is important. It has been a spiritual awaking underlying the fact what is important is that I work with integrity, boundaries, wisdom, enjoy being a doctor and healer.

Thank you so much for everything! You guys were great!

“Rob just wanted to say thank you again for everything you’ve done, I feel better today than I have in two years.” January 17, 2017

“You guys are great! Never needed an attorney before, and hope not to in the future, but it’s great to know that there are excellent people like you watching my back!!”

“He has a good sense of potential mitigating factors that might be impacting his clients, and he will seek out other colleagues to help his clients.”

view all testimonials
Stay Connected

Get Updates About Our Firm

Our Attorneys encourage client input to customize a strategy to provide the legal services you deserve. We provide experienced representation for those in Florida and now Texas.